Dashboard > KMD2003 > Introduction > Course Themes > Knowledge Media > Knowledge Forum Version 4.6 review
  KMD2003 Log In | Sign Up   View a printable version of the current page.  
  Knowledge Forum Version 4.6 review
Added by Jim Slotta, last edited by Jim Slotta on Jun 26, 2007  (view change)
Labels: 
(None)

KF version 4.6 – Specific comments

  • the lack of hypertext means that you're always looking at a map.
  • There is little or no immersivity.
    • (as opposed to a wiki, where there can only be immersive experience. You would never look at a map of a wiki)
  • Good features:
    • can add metatags in for different purposes of scaffold (e.g., opinion, theory building)
    • can have keywords that are open ended
    • can add a reference to another view.
    • can add a reference to another note.
  • critique of features:
    • too many notes/windows open.
    • not everyone can see the history
    • connecting/referencing ideas is not natural
      • can connect a new note to other notes - but not to specific portions of the notes
    • You never end up reading everything that links from the view list
    • Worse, you can't figure out which notes to read
    • Rise aboves aren't used, for some reason.
      • RISE Aboves, which simply tag all notes with a common tag, take the note out of action from being part of other rise aboves. not good.
    • KF seems rather intrinsically heterarchical - deliberately so, but perhaps to a fault.
    • Community aspect seems non-existent. Don't seem really connected to other people - just to the notes that they contribute.
  • comparison with common wiki features
    • Wiki is somehow easier to refactor and factor multiple ways
    • Wiki seems to have an implicit barn raising, where everyone is dedicating to come
    • Tagging should be an opening of relationships, not a closing off or putitng into drawers.
  • Enhanced view
    • Even in the enhanced view, in the very best case you'll see every note linked to every other note - and it won't really give you any more info.
      • In a wiki, the relationships are intrinsic to the organization, the fact that they're hypertexted means that all the links are invisible. (You'd never look at a graphical representation of a wiki.
    • And you can only link to another note, not to a Web page (have to put the page into another note.
    • Maps nodes but no real mechanism; no hypertext, rich media, rich tags, open source
    • no destination - there is no narrative
    • Windows pop up but the ideas get lost in the clutter
  • Suggestions for KF:
    • Would be great for KF to add an emergent layer of dynamic organization - where keywords generate a web page that sorts all the notes.
    • Also, to show relationships between tags. (rise above can be seen as a higher level tag)
    • A zoom-out social view
Site powered by a free Open Source Project / Non-profit License (more) of Confluence - the Enterprise wiki.
Learn more or evaluate Confluence for your organisation.
Powered by Atlassian Confluence, the Enterprise Wiki. (Version: 2.2.10 Build:#528 Nov 29, 2006) - Bug/feature request - Contact Administrators