Openlearn
Overview
Guiding Question: Why do course reviews only happen at the end of a course? How can we continually learn from past course experiences?
Vision: What if students and professors could dynamically collaborate on how to best design a course to fit the learning needs of all students?
Knowledge Communities
- Students - post-secondary level
- Professors - to have an insight into student's learning styles and how to best suit those needs
- Administration - this community was thoroughly discussed throughout design process, but ultimately was dropped from design considerations for initial release
Learning Goals
- Social community geared at helping students to reflect on learning in post-secondary situations
formally in courses, informally by contact with others
- share learning experiences and build knowledge
- students can position themselves in contrast to others
- students are able to comment on what worked best in a course and why, or what didn't work and how to improve it to learn how they learn best
- Students will discover what their best learning style is and how this may change over time
- Professors will now be able to receive real-time feedback on the learning styles and preferences of students
End result: courses can be designed before and throughout the term to best meet the learning needs of students
Design Considerations
- How do we keep the design open enough to include all possible perspectives, yet ensure that the report results are meaningful to the user?
- Wizard approach - too constrained prevents it from being simple to use
- Easy of use vs. Richly tagged data - too many steps may hinder user input or reflection on learning experience
- Different approaches considered for categorization: Gardner's Multiple Intelligences, Knowledge Building, Scaffolding, Constructivism, Social Learning Theory
- No agreement on how learning happens best
- using one theory would be too rigid
- Why not make it open and let professors decide?
- poll students on specific learning styles related to a theory
- Prompted questions may limit knowledge growth
- Social knowledge building on learning - students design own categories (tags) and recognize own patterns
- Open concept - No formal set learning style approach will be used at this time
*Community developed knowledge focusing on learning experiences is favoured
Student's Perspective
- How do we invite people to interact and reflect?
- Find similarities and differences with peers
- Five point scale for likes and dislikes
- Find your pattern of best learning- with the help of others
Result: This tool's success depends on student community input
Instructor's Perspective
- Could assume administrator role for course
- Ability to add diagnostic learning style questions, quizzes or questions linked to learning theories that they value (i.e. multiple intelligence quiz)
- Continuous improvement of course through use of the tool
Result: This tool could be linked to course syllabus, resources, wikis and presentations
Administrator's perspective
- Discussed possibility of this as an administrative tool for course selection, or as an automated system to track credits/repository of learning
- Social tags don't cater to absolutes
- High degree of control would be needed
Result: design would be too constrained with administrative goals at this point
Design Template Images
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture1-2.png) not found.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture2-2.png) not found.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture3-2.png) not found.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture4-2.png) not found.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture5-2.png) not found.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture6-2.png) not found.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture7-2.png) not found.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture8-2.png) not found.
Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture9-2.png) not found.
Implementation
- Open Source - able to evolve from user and designer input
- Increased integration - able to use new tools i.e., Java Script, Ajax (to parse data in real-time), Web 2.0
- Use Joomla platform - open source content management system
Implementation Constraints
- Growth is dependent on user input
- User-submitted data can be unreliable- users will need to govern themselves
- Category constraints
Possible Future Applications
Very different future scenarios exist for this design
- Social context only if Professors don't see value
- Course selection tools could be added and an administrative use enabled for Registrar use
- Change in how learning is viewed and measured, i.e. Universities could one day allow students to openly traverse their learning experiences by jumping across snippets of courses