Dashboard > KMD2003 > Introduction > Knowledge Community Design Ideas > 2006 Design pages > Openlearn
  KMD2003 Log In | Sign Up   View a printable version of the current page.  
  Openlearn
Added by Aleisha Howlett, last edited by Jim Slotta on Sep 11, 2008  (view change)
Labels: 
(None)

Openlearn

Overview

Guiding Question: Why do course reviews only happen at the end of a course? How can we continually learn from past course experiences?

Vision: What if students and professors could dynamically collaborate on how to best design a course to fit the learning needs of all students?

Knowledge Communities

  • Students - post-secondary level
  • Professors - to have an insight into student's learning styles and how to best suit those needs
  • Administration - this community was thoroughly discussed throughout design process, but ultimately was dropped from design considerations for initial release

Learning Goals

  • Social community geared at helping students to reflect on learning in post-secondary situations
    formally in courses, informally by contact with others
  • share learning experiences and build knowledge
  • students can position themselves in contrast to others
  • students are able to comment on what worked best in a course and why, or what didn't work and how to improve it to learn how they learn best
  • Students will discover what their best learning style is and how this may change over time
  • Professors will now be able to receive real-time feedback on the learning styles and preferences of students
    End result: courses can be designed before and throughout the term to best meet the learning needs of students

Design Considerations

  • How do we keep the design open enough to include all possible perspectives, yet ensure that the report results are meaningful to the user?
  • Wizard approach - too constrained prevents it from being simple to use
  • Easy of use vs. Richly tagged data - too many steps may hinder user input or reflection on learning experience
  • Different approaches considered for categorization: Gardner's Multiple Intelligences, Knowledge Building, Scaffolding, Constructivism, Social Learning Theory
  • No agreement on how learning happens best
  • using one theory would be too rigid
  • Why not make it open and let professors decide?
  • poll students on specific learning styles related to a theory
  • Prompted questions may limit knowledge growth
  • Social knowledge building on learning - students design own categories (tags) and recognize own patterns
  • Open concept - No formal set learning style approach will be used at this time
    *Community developed knowledge focusing on learning experiences is favoured

Student's Perspective

  • How do we invite people to interact and reflect?
  • Find similarities and differences with peers
  • Five point scale for likes and dislikes
  • Find your pattern of best learning- with the help of others
    Result: This tool's success depends on student community input

Instructor's Perspective

  • Could assume administrator role for course
  • Ability to add diagnostic learning style questions, quizzes or questions linked to learning theories that they value (i.e. multiple intelligence quiz)
  • Continuous improvement of course through use of the tool
    Result: This tool could be linked to course syllabus, resources, wikis and presentations

Administrator's perspective

  • Discussed possibility of this as an administrative tool for course selection, or as an automated system to track credits/repository of learning
  • Social tags don't cater to absolutes
  • High degree of control would be needed
    Result: design would be too constrained with administrative goals at this point

Design Template Images

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture1-2.png) not found.

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture2-2.png) not found.

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture3-2.png) not found.

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture4-2.png) not found.

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture5-2.png) not found.

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture6-2.png) not found.

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture7-2.png) not found.

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture8-2.png) not found.

Unable to render embedded object: File (Picture9-2.png) not found.

Implementation

  • Open Source - able to evolve from user and designer input
  • Increased integration - able to use new tools i.e., Java Script, Ajax (to parse data in real-time), Web 2.0
  • Use Joomla platform - open source content management system

Implementation Constraints

  • Growth is dependent on user input
  • User-submitted data can be unreliable- users will need to govern themselves
  • Category constraints

Possible Future Applications

Very different future scenarios exist for this design

  • Social context only if Professors don't see value
  • Course selection tools could be added and an administrative use enabled for Registrar use
  • Change in how learning is viewed and measured, i.e. Universities could one day allow students to openly traverse their learning experiences by jumping across snippets of courses
Site powered by a free Open Source Project / Non-profit License (more) of Confluence - the Enterprise wiki.
Learn more or evaluate Confluence for your organisation.
Powered by Atlassian Confluence, the Enterprise Wiki. (Version: 2.2.10 Build:#528 Nov 29, 2006) - Bug/feature request - Contact Administrators